Tokenization & RWA
Asset mapping, token classification, investor eligibility, transfer restrictions and the design of a secondary market that regulators can live with.
UAE · Singapore · Switzerland · UK sandboxA tokenized fund, an IP holding, a cross-border raise — almost none of them live in one country. They live in two or three, and they break at the seams. New Circle designs those seams: which vehicle sits where, under whose rules, and for which investors.
Every serious mandate resolves into three questions, not one. Select a ring to see what sits there.
Select a ring
This is the clearest thing we can tell you, so we lead with it. New Circle is an advisory and structuring practice. Clients own their vehicles, their assets and their filings — we are not a party to any of them.
Different clients, same underlying question: where does each layer of this business belong, and what does that choice cost you later.
Asset mapping, token classification, investor eligibility, transfer restrictions and the design of a secondary market that regulators can live with.
UAE · Singapore · Switzerland · UK sandboxFund domicile, share-class and governance design, and the distribution layer that decides which investors you can actually accept.
Cayman · UAE · SingaporeWhere the intellectual property sits, who owns it, how it is licensed to the operating company, and whether the structure survives a funding round.
Delaware · Cyprus · Singapore · UKGovernance, succession, cross-border investment access and the SPV or fund wrappers that keep private holdings clean across generations.
Switzerland · Singapore · UAE · CaymanGroup architecture with real substance: intra-group flows, IP placement and a shape that reads well in diligence and at exit.
Selected per asset and exit pathMost clients arrive describing a product and leave with a structure. The first conversation is about the asset and the investor — the entity comes last.
Start there →No structure is proposed before the asset and the investor base are settled. That order is not negotiable — reversing it is how expensive structures get built for the wrong audience.
Asset type, investor base, distribution reach, appetite for regulatory friction. Ends with a shortlist of viable jurisdictions and the trade-offs of each.
Vehicle design across each layer, coordination with licensed local counsel, and the governing documents and policies the structure runs on.
Governance, disclosures, record-keeping and structural review as new markets, investors or asset classes come into scope.
Tokenization gets the attention. It is not where a new practice should earn its first references. Our sequence is deliberate and we are open about it.
Lowest regulatory exposure, fastest path from first call to a structure that works. This is where we take mandates today.
Opened deliberately, on a selective basis, once the advisory-only boundary is proven in practice rather than asserted on a page.
Relationship-led work that should follow a track record, not precede one. We would rather be early to the conversation than early to the mandate.
The first conversation is diagnostic and costs nothing: what you are building, who is meant to hold it, and which jurisdictions are genuinely open to that combination. If a structure isn't warranted yet, we will tell you that.